Let us take as an example the measurement of time.

Having experienced that all motions take “time”, mankind discovered and developed ways to measure and define the perceived flow of time. Although this still does not tell us much about the nature of Time itself, its observed effect has nonetheless helped us to make sense of the physical world we live in.

Now, I do not wish to get carried away trying to explain mathematical, physical or technical details about methods of time measurement. So let me just make a few essential statements of how our current definition of time relates to the phenomenon of precession.

We live by the time of our clocks – and each second counts!

Five decades ago, ‘exact science’ formulated a definition of the physical unit ‘second’ that is based solely on the precise length of the tropical year.

The experts had realized that the new standard of time should be based on the period of revolution of the Earth around the Sun instead of its period of rotation on its axis.

Initially, astronomers understood Earth’s revolution period to be a roughly twenty minutes longer sidereal year. But it was argued that the tropical year is more fundamental than sidereal year, because the length of sidereal year depends upon the value of the precession.

Paradoxically, the Newtonian or lunisolar precession model requires that the rate of precession determines the length of the tropical year and not the sidereal.

Nontheless, astronomers simply substituted one year for the other without ever proving their time-equivalence. There is absolutely no scientific proof that the defined time interval of the "mean solar day" is based on the longer sidereal year. In fact, the truest measure for Earth’s complete 360-degree orbit around the Sun is the tropical year - a roughly twenty minutes longer period is fiction.

The blatant inconsistencies of the lunisolar precession model are also revealed by observations and mathematical equations of Earth’s period of rotation and revolution relative to various celestial objects within the solar system, which clearly show that the axis of the Earth does not wobble.

Just for the record I should mention to you that nearly six years ago I brought these findings to the attention of the International Astronomical Union in Paris and many other authorities worldwide. The overwhelming response appears to be one of denial – astronomers refuse to address the inherent time problem of the Newtonian precession model.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 

◄ Page ►