 |

"Precession of the Equinox" is an observed celestial phenomenon.
It is the slow backward or retrograde movement of the equinoctial
points through the constellations of the Zodiac. Although more commonly
referred to as precession, the term is actually a misnomer because
precession is an assumed physical cause for the observed gradual changes
in the orientation of the Earth's axis in space. The gravitational
influences of the Sun and the Moon on the oblate Earth are said to
cause precession (hence, the term 'lunisolar precession'). Astronomers
believe that the length of the tropical year depends upon the adopted
value of the precession (currently the rate is about 50.26" per
tropical year). Our civil calendar is based on the length of the tropical
year.
Because astronomers are convinced that the Moon* of the Earth determines
our calendar, they fool us to think that a non-relevant and unproven
time interval of 365.2564 mean solar days is the truest measure for
Earth's 360° revolution around the Sun. It is supposed to be the
basis for calculating and predicting the exact occurrence of celestial
phenomena in our solar system, like solar eclipses, Venus transits,
Perseid meteor shower etc. However, it has been determined, that solar
eclipse cycles occur precisely according to tropical time (i.e. Earth's
360° orbital period around the Sun of 365.242198 mean solar days)
- a fact admitted by astronomers. Hence, the tropical year is regarded
as a 360° orbit of the Earth around the Sun.
* (Some astronomers even believe that without our Moon the axis
of the Earth would loose its stability, causing the Earth to tumble
chaotically in space (Would the same principle apply to Mars and its
two tiny moons?). The periodic appearance of the Perseid meteor shower
around the 11th of August and the transits of Venus, for example,
would no longer be predictable. In other words, without the influence
of our "important" Moon there would be no order and harmony
in the solar system.)
But since the so-called sidereal year of 365.2564 mean solar days
is also viewed as a 360° orbit, a problem exists: There cannot
be two different 360° orbits in the same orbital path of the Earth
around the sun. Astronomers seem to have a simple solution; they assert
that Earth completes such 360° sidereal orbits with approx. 20
minutes shorter tropical years.
The following example may help to further clarify this problem:
Suppose we let the big hand of our clock run in counterclockwise direction
starting from the number 12 back to the same number; i.e. a complete
360° revolution. The next revolution ends by the number 1; i.e.
not a complete 360° revolution. The third revolution starts by
the number 1 and ends by the number 2. Then counting from 2 it ends
by 3, etc. This repeating period is defined as the 'fundamental time'.
The trick is that astronomers rotate the dial of the clock in a clockwise
direction, thus completing the "shorter" revolution always
by the number 12 - does this imply a 360° revolution?
This means that either the sidereal year is also NOT a 360° orbit
and constantly follows the tropical year at a 20-minute "distance",
or it is a 360° orbit and the difference between the two years
accumulates by 20 minutes each year. (First orbit 20 minutes, second
40 minutes, third 60 minutes, etc.) In both cases, the tropical year
would be less than a 360° orbit.
But as we have seen, solar eclipses are based on a 360° tropical
orbit period. Do astronomers really want to suggest that they choose
for convenience a 360° tropical year when plotting eclipses and
the like but revert to a less than 360° tropical year when trying
to determine star positions?
It is already incomprehensible how solar eclipse cycles can be squeezed
into an Earth orbit of less than 360° without overturning the
laws of geometry. But trying to fit in transits of Venus or the occurrence
of the Perseid meteor shower, which have no connection at all with
the Earth and its Moon seems indeed mind-boggling.
As a matter of fact, a "1223 s longer" sidereal year has
NEVER been used as basis for the definition of time. Since ancient
times only the tropical year was regarded as a reference frame, crucial
for the calculation of celestial phenomena, including the movement
of the Sun through the constellations of the Zodiac. For modern astronomy
the "Great Year" (the cycle of the Zodiac) has no significance
anymore.
When in 1955 the period of revolution of the Earth around the Sun
was used as the basis for the definition of the 'second', some astronomers
understood this to be the roughly 20 minutes longer sidereal year,
which length depends on the adopted value of the precession. When
it was realized, however, that the sidereal year for 1900.0 * is actually
time equivalent to the tropical year for 1900.0, the tropical year
was substituted for this true sidereal year - a "minor correction" as it was called!
* (Given a precession rate of about 50.26 " per tropical
year the maximum time difference is only 3.35 seconds, not 1223 seconds.
Observations show that the mean transit time of Sirius is identical
to the mean sidereal day [astrodynamical constant]. Hence, Sirius
and Sun are connected with the imaginary line, which the Earth crosses
in its 360° orbit around the Sun. That fact alone allows for the
substitution of the tropical year for the sidereal year)
After the introduction of atomic time, the tropical year became meaningless.
Vernal equinox, Sun and stars now have to make room for terrestrial
atomic clocks, mainly so that military GPS can utilize a stable and
uniform time signal free of leap seconds. But since no known element
exists that oscillates synchronous to tropical time, leap seconds
cannot be eliminated. They ensure that, on average, the Sun continues
to be overhead on the (e.g.) Greenwich meridian at 12 o'clock noon
to within one second. Without leap seconds atomic time will continue
to deviate from mean solar time (Greenwich Mean Sidereal Time).
In 1582 the Church was forced to reform the calendar. Does science
intend to let centuries pass, before correcting our terrestrial clocks
to tropical time again?
Nowadays, Quasars are regarded as a reference to determine Earth's
daily rotation and orientation in space, through which Earth apparently
moves meaningless with constantly varying rotation speed. Astronomers
believe that such fluctuations in Earth's period of rotation are due
to a presumed inner core movement of the Earth, increasing distance
of the Moon, as well as tidal and atmospheric influences. In other
words, Earth performs some sort of pirouette dance, turning sometimes
faster or slower on its axis.
The physical fact, however, that these detected changes in the rotation
period can be explained by small, but non-predictable oscillations
of the spin axis, thus causing a displacement of the observer's location
on Earth with respect to inertial space, has probably never entered
their mind.
The new lunisolar precession theory - solution or dilemma?
In the past, textbooks taught that the Greenwich meridian precesses
and that a sidereal day of about 86164.09966 s (latest observations
suggest 86164.0989 s) is about 9.12 ms (8.36 ms) longer than the absolute
360-degree rotation of the Earth on its axis of 86164.0905382 seconds.
The latter is the time interval of the mean sidereal day, which is
a primary astrodynamical constant.
Dr. Tom Van Flandern is an eminent astronomer and a former expert
at the US Naval Observatory. In a correspondence he indicated, however,
that the mean solar day and the sidereal day - i.e. the rotation of
the Earth, as measured relative to the fixed stars or quasars - are
NOT affected by precession, only the mean sidereal day (equinox to
equinox) is affected by precession. In his opinion the sidereal year
no longer depends on the value of the precession, but the tropical
year does.
To briefly summarize the modifications to the standard lunisolar precession
model:
1. The absolute rotation of the Earth on its axis is now about 9 ms
longer. That means Earth's rotation relative to the stars is no longer
360° 50.26", but 360°
2. The Greenwich meridian does NOT precess; i.e. it is fixed relative
to inertial space
3. The primary astrodynamical constant of the mean sidereal day is
now based on an Earth rotation period of LESS than 360°
If precession does not affect the rotation and revolution period of
the Earth, as measured relative to the Sun and relative to the stars,
how can precession cause a rotation and revolution time difference
of more than 3 seconds per day?
Astronomers claim that it takes the Sun about 31,558,149 s or 365.2564
mean solar of 86400 s days to travel 360° 50.26" around the
ecliptic of the Earth.
IF the equator of the Earth does NOT wobble relative to the Sun, astronomers
believe that it also takes the same amount of mean solar days for
the Sun to travel exactly 360° around the ecliptic of the Earth.
Again, we need to ponder the problem of the mysterious distance of
50 arc-seconds. It was said that the Earth cannot travel through an
additional spatial distance of 50 arc-seconds in its orbit around
the Sun without extra rotation, implying extra time. Since a rotation
time difference of more than 3 s per day does NOT exist, yet the Sun
travels through the Zodiac at a rate of about 50" per year, there
is only one solution: The Earth along with the Sun and the rest of
the solarsystem moves roughly 50" each tropical year in a still
undetermined orbit. Regardless of how fast the solarsystem travles
through space in an orbit of its own, a 360° revolution period
of the Earth around the Sun of 31,558,149 s does NOT exist.
Observations and measurements prove that it takes the Sun about 31,556,926
s or 365.2422 mean solar days to travel exactly 360° around the
ecliptic of the Earth.
Mathematically, the mean solar day of 86400 s is based on a circle
of exactly 360°.
In practice, the constant of the mean solar day of 86400 s is based
on the mean time interval measured from the Greenwich meridian between
two successive transits of the vernal equinox, which remains fixed
with respect to the Sun and the orientation of Earth's rotation axis
in space.
next page 1 - 2 - 3
|
 |